202107.06
Off
0

Ben Davidson explains Supreme Court Arthrex decision on constitutionality of PTAB judges and PTO Guidance for Seeking Director Review

by in News

On June 21, the Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Arthrex that PTAB administrative judges who decide inter partes reviews were appointed by the Patent Office in violation of the Constitution’s Appointments Clause.  The Court held that the PTO’s Director must be allowed to review the PTAB’s decisions in order to act as a “superior” to…

202010.27
Off
0

Ben Davidson quoted by the Daily Journal regarding petitions seeking review of a Federal Circuit decision

by in News

October 27, 2020.  Ben Davidson quoted by the Daily Journal regarding petitions seeking review of a Federal Circuit decision holding that all administrative patent judges hired by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office were unconstitutionally appointed.  Justices to Weigh Validity of Administrative Patent Judge Hiring, Los Angeles Daily Journal, Oct. 10, 2020.

202003.17
Off
0

Davidson Law Group convinces the PTAB to not institute an IPR trial requested by AMP Plus, Inc. against DMF, Inc. 

by in News

March 17, 2020.  Davidson Law Group, together with Ergonic LLC, convinces the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to not institute an inter partes review (IPR) trial requested by AMP Plus, Inc. dba ELCO Lighting against U.S. Patent No. 9,964,266 owned by DMF, Inc.  The patent relates to a recessed lighting system.  The case number is IPR2019-01500.